<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Camera Do You Use?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/2008/what-type-of-camera-do-you-shoot-with/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/2008/what-type-of-camera-do-you-shoot-with</link>
	<description>Making the Moment Photography writes on all aspects of creative family and wedding photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/2008/what-type-of-camera-do-you-shoot-with/comment-page-1#comment-3736</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/?p=148#comment-3736</guid>
		<description>Shawn,  Thanks for the reply.  I wouldn&#039;t question the camera bodies so much - the 7D is a nice semi-pro body in and of itself, and can hit some pretty good ISO levels.  I&#039;m not a huge fan of either, only because I don&#039;t like crop bodies for my main work anymore... full frame is so nice!  

More than the bodies though, I would encourage you to look into the quality and range of the glass you use, as that is far more important than your bodies.   I&#039;d recommend investing in some Canon prime lenses, and L glass if you can afford it.  There certainly is a difference I&#039;ve learned.  

More than anything - I&#039;d encourage you to intern or shadow a professional wedding photographer for a year or so prior to taking on your own weddings.  More than gear -  experience, confidence, &amp; talent will be the greatest asset you can bring with you on a wedding day.

I hope that helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn,  Thanks for the reply.  I wouldn&#8217;t question the camera bodies so much &#8211; the 7D is a nice semi-pro body in and of itself, and can hit some pretty good ISO levels.  I&#8217;m not a huge fan of either, only because I don&#8217;t like crop bodies for my main work anymore&#8230; full frame is so nice!  </p>
<p>More than the bodies though, I would encourage you to look into the quality and range of the glass you use, as that is far more important than your bodies.   I&#8217;d recommend investing in some Canon prime lenses, and L glass if you can afford it.  There certainly is a difference I&#8217;ve learned.  </p>
<p>More than anything &#8211; I&#8217;d encourage you to intern or shadow a professional wedding photographer for a year or so prior to taking on your own weddings.  More than gear &#8211;  experience, confidence, &amp; talent will be the greatest asset you can bring with you on a wedding day.</p>
<p>I hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn R</title>
		<link>http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/2008/what-type-of-camera-do-you-shoot-with/comment-page-1#comment-3733</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/?p=148#comment-3733</guid>
		<description>So I read what you said about checking to see how good of quality your wedding photographer&#039;s gear is.  So the Camera bodies that I use are a Cannon 7d and Cannon 60D.
I have a couple of 2.8 lens bodies(70-200mm,tamron 17-50mm), and some other lenses also.  But What I&#039;m wanting to know is if you would consider these two bodies professional enough for wedding photography.  I mostly have done portraits over the last couple of years and have done only one small wedding but I&#039;m wanting to do more weddings this upcoming year.  So what are the thought s on my camera bodies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I read what you said about checking to see how good of quality your wedding photographer&#8217;s gear is.  So the Camera bodies that I use are a Cannon 7d and Cannon 60D.<br />
I have a couple of 2.8 lens bodies(70-200mm,tamron 17-50mm), and some other lenses also.  But What I&#8217;m wanting to know is if you would consider these two bodies professional enough for wedding photography.  I mostly have done portraits over the last couple of years and have done only one small wedding but I&#8217;m wanting to do more weddings this upcoming year.  So what are the thought s on my camera bodies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/2008/what-type-of-camera-do-you-shoot-with/comment-page-1#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/?p=148#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Rock on Sara - I love it.    You&#039;re not late at all, the conversations always build and grow around here, so feel free to jump in whenever you&#039;d like. ;)

Congrats on deciding to make the next step in growing yourself - I hope it goes well for you, I certainly know the steps it takes, and the fun it can be.  

Little tip for you - (or anyone for that matter) - I think a nice &amp; wallet-friendly addition to a beginner lens collection is the 1.8 50mm lens.  Both Canon &amp; Nikon have a version - it&#039;s not priced too expensively, but can give you an edge in low light situations, and also create a nice &quot;art&quot; feel with it&#039;s nice Depth of Field.

I wouldn&#039;t stop there by any means - it&#039;s not the best glass on the market - but it is a solidly made prime lens, and is priced awesomely for a beginner photographer.  If you&#039;re a pro - I&#039;d recommend the 1.4 model, or the 1.2 model if you can afford it.  Heck, I&#039;d recommend the 1.0 model if you can find it somewhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rock on Sara &#8211; I love it.    You&#8217;re not late at all, the conversations always build and grow around here, so feel free to jump in whenever you&#8217;d like. <img src='http://www.makingthemoment.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Congrats on deciding to make the next step in growing yourself &#8211; I hope it goes well for you, I certainly know the steps it takes, and the fun it can be.  </p>
<p>Little tip for you &#8211; (or anyone for that matter) &#8211; I think a nice &#038; wallet-friendly addition to a beginner lens collection is the 1.8 50mm lens.  Both Canon &#038; Nikon have a version &#8211; it&#8217;s not priced too expensively, but can give you an edge in low light situations, and also create a nice &#8220;art&#8221; feel with it&#8217;s nice Depth of Field.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t stop there by any means &#8211; it&#8217;s not the best glass on the market &#8211; but it is a solidly made prime lens, and is priced awesomely for a beginner photographer.  If you&#8217;re a pro &#8211; I&#8217;d recommend the 1.4 model, or the 1.2 model if you can afford it.  Heck, I&#8217;d recommend the 1.0 model if you can find it somewhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Reimer</title>
		<link>http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/2008/what-type-of-camera-do-you-shoot-with/comment-page-1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Reimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/?p=148#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I totally understand the last part of your comment here Brett. Sorry if I&#039;m a little late on the conversation, I just sort of stumbled upon your blog (and I love what I see, by the way!) I am an aspiring photographer just starting to get into the business. I have been shooting on a little Canon Rebel for the last three years and I need to buy new equipment because I find it&#039;s actually prohibiting my creativity! There are pictures that I know I can create and levels I know I can reach, but not with a Rebel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally understand the last part of your comment here Brett. Sorry if I&#8217;m a little late on the conversation, I just sort of stumbled upon your blog (and I love what I see, by the way!) I am an aspiring photographer just starting to get into the business. I have been shooting on a little Canon Rebel for the last three years and I need to buy new equipment because I find it&#8217;s actually prohibiting my creativity! There are pictures that I know I can create and levels I know I can reach, but not with a Rebel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/2008/what-type-of-camera-do-you-shoot-with/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/?p=148#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Great questions / thoughts Shawn - love it.

I&#039;d love to build a dialogue here, because I often think that being a &quot;pro photographer&quot; is something of a hard title to really hold and nail down.  I&#039;ve seen too many &quot;pros&quot; who (for lack of better words) aren&#039;t very professional, and aren&#039;t good at what they do.  are they still &quot;pros&quot;?

Let me say what it&#039;s not - I wouldn&#039;t say it&#039;s the first pay check (I remember the first time I got paid for photos - I was still an amateur!), and it&#039;s certainly not when you&#039;re only doing photography full time.  Attempting to pin the title of &quot;pro&quot; on these definers, is akin to saying &quot;if it&#039;s in a garage, it must be a car&quot;.

I think it tends to be a mix of thing.  Without making this comment a blog post in and of itself - I&#039;ve noticed a few things that define the professional from the amateur.

1)  The ability to consistently create attractive and technically controlled photos.  I&#039;m not going to say technically correct - b/c often photography is more about breaking the rules than obeying them - so the idea of being able to control the technical end of your work is a must.

2)  The acknowledgment and accreditation from a community of professional photographers (be it a recognized group like the PPA, or a set of local talented professionals.)  Of course, life isn&#039;t about what others think of you - but if you can&#039;t find a group of quality photographers that are willing to say &quot;we stand with you and behind your work&quot; then maybe it&#039;s time to rethink your career path!

Great thoughts too on the equipment - I just want to tag in that although I&#039;m a Canon shooter, that doesn&#039;t mean I think Nikon is bad!  Nikon makes awesome equipment - I just went down a different path.

I do believe that a photographer is not the sum total of his lens collection and I love what you&#039;re saying - do what you can with what you got!

but I do have to disagree a bit - having better equipment can certainly be more effective and enhance ones creativity.  If a photographer is doing well with their current set of equipment, they ought to be able to naturally afford better equipment as they go!

Let me first clarify- I believe creativity is innate in a person - and the best equipment can&#039;t make an uncreative person a creative photographer.  But I do know that having the next level of equipment makes an INCREDIBLE difference in how well a creative artist can grow.  There is a tremendous difference between cheap stock lenses and pro-grade high quality lenses!

I could go on here for a bit - but I&#039;m confident you know what I mean - it is impossible to achieve most imagery w/o having the right glass.  Having a diverse high quality lens collection will take any photographers work to the next level.

And don&#039;t even get me started on pocket wizards!  :)

Thanks for your thoughts Shawn - love to hear more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great questions / thoughts Shawn &#8211; love it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to build a dialogue here, because I often think that being a &#8220;pro photographer&#8221; is something of a hard title to really hold and nail down.  I&#8217;ve seen too many &#8220;pros&#8221; who (for lack of better words) aren&#8217;t very professional, and aren&#8217;t good at what they do.  are they still &#8220;pros&#8221;?</p>
<p>Let me say what it&#8217;s not &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s the first pay check (I remember the first time I got paid for photos &#8211; I was still an amateur!), and it&#8217;s certainly not when you&#8217;re only doing photography full time.  Attempting to pin the title of &#8220;pro&#8221; on these definers, is akin to saying &#8220;if it&#8217;s in a garage, it must be a car&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think it tends to be a mix of thing.  Without making this comment a blog post in and of itself &#8211; I&#8217;ve noticed a few things that define the professional from the amateur.</p>
<p>1)  The ability to consistently create attractive and technically controlled photos.  I&#8217;m not going to say technically correct &#8211; b/c often photography is more about breaking the rules than obeying them &#8211; so the idea of being able to control the technical end of your work is a must.</p>
<p>2)  The acknowledgment and accreditation from a community of professional photographers (be it a recognized group like the PPA, or a set of local talented professionals.)  Of course, life isn&#8217;t about what others think of you &#8211; but if you can&#8217;t find a group of quality photographers that are willing to say &#8220;we stand with you and behind your work&#8221; then maybe it&#8217;s time to rethink your career path!</p>
<p>Great thoughts too on the equipment &#8211; I just want to tag in that although I&#8217;m a Canon shooter, that doesn&#8217;t mean I think Nikon is bad!  Nikon makes awesome equipment &#8211; I just went down a different path.</p>
<p>I do believe that a photographer is not the sum total of his lens collection and I love what you&#8217;re saying &#8211; do what you can with what you got!</p>
<p>but I do have to disagree a bit &#8211; having better equipment can certainly be more effective and enhance ones creativity.  If a photographer is doing well with their current set of equipment, they ought to be able to naturally afford better equipment as they go!</p>
<p>Let me first clarify- I believe creativity is innate in a person &#8211; and the best equipment can&#8217;t make an uncreative person a creative photographer.  But I do know that having the next level of equipment makes an INCREDIBLE difference in how well a creative artist can grow.  There is a tremendous difference between cheap stock lenses and pro-grade high quality lenses!</p>
<p>I could go on here for a bit &#8211; but I&#8217;m confident you know what I mean &#8211; it is impossible to achieve most imagery w/o having the right glass.  Having a diverse high quality lens collection will take any photographers work to the next level.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t even get me started on pocket wizards!  <img src='http://www.makingthemoment.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts Shawn &#8211; love to hear more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/2008/what-type-of-camera-do-you-shoot-with/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingthemoment.com/blog/?p=148#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I too agree that the most expensive gear does not make you a &quot;photographer&quot; though I&#039;m left wondering what it does take...is it your first paycheck, is it your slew of compliments...or is it when you are only doing photography full time and nothing else.  I use Nikon primarily and otherwise the best that I can afford.  The gear that you have and can afford you should get to know as best you can, be as creative as you can and I believe that semi professional equipment and be just as effective as a 20,000 kit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too agree that the most expensive gear does not make you a &#8220;photographer&#8221; though I&#8217;m left wondering what it does take&#8230;is it your first paycheck, is it your slew of compliments&#8230;or is it when you are only doing photography full time and nothing else.  I use Nikon primarily and otherwise the best that I can afford.  The gear that you have and can afford you should get to know as best you can, be as creative as you can and I believe that semi professional equipment and be just as effective as a 20,000 kit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

